Franky
New member
I used to dread writing abstracts. How was I supposed to summarize an entire 20-page paper in 200 words? Everything I wrote felt either too vague or too detailed. After a lot of trial and error and feedback from professors, I finally figured out a formula that works.
The key is understanding that an abstract is a mini-version of your entire paper, not just an introduction. It needs to stand alone and make sense to someone who hasn't read the full paper . Most journals and professors expect it to follow the same structure as your paper, just condensed.
Here's the simple structure I now use:
Some other tips I've learned:
The key is understanding that an abstract is a mini-version of your entire paper, not just an introduction. It needs to stand alone and make sense to someone who hasn't read the full paper . Most journals and professors expect it to follow the same structure as your paper, just condensed.
Here's the simple structure I now use:
- Background/context – 1-2 sentences on what we already know and why this research matters
- Problem/question – 1 sentence stating what gap you're filling or what you investigated
- Methods – 1-2 sentences on how you did the research
- Key results – 2-3 sentences on your most important findings
- Conclusion/implications – 1-2 sentences on what it means and why it's significant
Some other tips I've learned:
- Check the target journal or assignment for word limits and formatting
- Use keywords from your field so it shows up in searches
- Avoid citations unless absolutely necessary
- Be specific—"significant difference" is vague, "p < 0.05" is concrete
- No jargon or acronyms without defining them first