How to create a perfect annotated bibliography

[Melissa]

I thought they were just busywork—like, why do I have to summarize every single source and write a paper? But then I realized that a good annotated bibliography is basically a first draft of your literature review. It's a tool, not just an assignment.

Here's my formula for the perfect annotation, paragraph by paragraph:

Paragraph 1: The Summary (Who, What, Where, When)

• What is this source about? What's the main argument or research question?
• What methodology did they use? (Experiment, case study, historical analysis?)
• What were the key findings or conclusions?
  Keep this objective—just the facts, no opinion yet.

Paragraph 2: The Evaluation (Is it any good?)

• Is this source credible? Is the author an expert in the field? Is the journal reputable?
• Is the argument convincing? Are there any biases or limitations?
• Is it current, or is it outdated? (For sciences, currency matters more. For humanities, older sources can be foundational.)

Paragraph 3: The Reflection (How will you use it?)

• How does this source fit into your research?
• Does it support your argument? Does it challenge it?
• Does it provide a counterargument you need to address? Does it fill a gap?
• Does it lead you to other sources?

If you write a paragraph for each of these, your annotation is perfect. And when it's time to write your paper, you already have all the summaries and evaluations done. It's like building the scaffolding before you build the house.